fatfs v0.12c March 04, 2017:
- Improved write throughput at the fragmented file on the exFAT volume. - Made memory usage for exFAT be able to be reduced as decreasing _MAX_LFN. - Fixed successive f_getfree() can return wrong count on the FAT12/16 volume. (appeared at R0.12) - Fixed configuration option _VOLUMES cannot be set 10. (appeared at R0.10c)
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
e749807f86
commit
fca959be37
63 files changed
+620
-499
No files matched your search
+1
-1
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ FRESULT f_readdir (
|
||||
<li>Setting of <tt>_MAX_LFN</tt> is insufficient for the long file name. (Not the case at <tt>_MAX_LFN == 255</tt>)</li>
|
||||
<li>The long file name contains any character not allowed in ANSI/OEM code. (Not the case at <tt>_LFN_UNICODE == 1</tt>)</li>
|
||||
</ul>
|
||||
<p>There is a problem on reading a directory of exFAT volume. The exFAT does not support short file name. This means no name can be returned on the condition above. If it is the case, a "?" is returned as file name to indicate that the object is not accessible. To avoid this problem, configure FatFs <tt>_LFN_UNICODE = 1</tt> and <tt>_MAX_LFN = 255</tt> to support the full feature of LFN specification.</p>
|
||||
<p>There is a problem on reading a directory of exFAT volume. The exFAT does not support short file name. This means no name can be returned on the condition above. If it is the case, "?" is returned into the <tt>fname[]</tt> to indicate that the object is not accessible. To avoid this problem, configure FatFs <tt>_LFN_UNICODE = 1</tt> and <tt>_MAX_LFN = 255</tt> to support the full feature of LFN specification.</p>
|
||||
</div>
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user