mirror of
				https://github.com/thunderbrewhq/thunderbrew
				synced 2025-10-31 16:26:03 +03:00 
			
		
		
		
	
		
			
				
	
	
		
			411 lines
		
	
	
		
			15 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
			
		
		
	
	
			411 lines
		
	
	
		
			15 KiB
		
	
	
	
		
			Markdown
		
	
	
	
	
	
| # Rules for documentation
 | |
| 
 | |
| These are the rules for the care and feeding of wikiheaders.pl.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## No style guide
 | |
| 
 | |
| When adding or editing documentation, we don't (currently) have a style guide
 | |
| for what it should read like, so try to make it consistent with the rest of
 | |
| the existing text. It generally should read more like technical reference
 | |
| manuals and not sound conversational in tone.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most of these rules are about how to make sure the documentation works on
 | |
| a _technical_ level, as scripts need to parse it, and there are a few simple
 | |
| rules we need to obey to cooperate with those scripts.
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## The wiki and headers share the same text.
 | |
| 
 | |
| There is a massive Perl script (`build-scripts/wikiheaders.pl`, hereafter
 | |
| referred to as "wikiheaders") that can read both the wiki and the public
 | |
| headers, and move changes in one across to the other.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you prefer to use the wiki, go ahead and edit there. If you prefer to use
 | |
| your own text editor, or command line tools to batch-process text, etc, you
 | |
| can [clone the wiki as a git repo](https://github.com/libsdl-org/sdlwiki) and
 | |
| work locally.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Don't taunt wikiheaders.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The script isn't magic; it's a massive pile of Regular Expressions and not
 | |
| a full C or markdown parser. While it isn't _fragile_, if you try to do clever
 | |
| things, you might confuse it. This is to the benefit of documentation, though,
 | |
| where we would rather you not do surprising things.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## We _sort of_ write in Doxygen format.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To document a symbol, we use something that looks like Doxygen (and Javadoc)
 | |
| standard comment format:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```c
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * This is a function that does something.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * It can be used for frozzling bobbles. Be aware that the Frozulator module
 | |
|  * _must_ be initialized before calling this.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * \param frozzlevel The amount of frozzling to perform.
 | |
|  * \param color What color bobble to frozzle. 0 is red, 1 is green.
 | |
|  * \returns the number of bobbles that were actually frozzled, -1 on error.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * \threadsafety Do not call this from two threads at once, or the bobbles
 | |
|  *               won't all frozzle correctly!
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * \since This function is available since SDL 7.3.1.
 | |
|  *
 | |
|  * \sa SDL_DoSomethingElse
 | |
|  */
 | |
| extern SDL_DECLSPEC int SDLCALL SDL_DoSomething(int frozzlevel, int color);
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Note the `/**` at the start of the comment. That's a "Doxygen-style" comment,
 | |
| and wikiheaders will treat this differently than a comment with one `*`, as
 | |
| this signifies that this is not just a comment, but _documentation_.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These comments _must_ start in the first column of the line, or wikiheaders
 | |
| will ignore them, even with the "/**" start (we should improve the script
 | |
| someday to handle this, but currently this is a requirement).
 | |
| 
 | |
| We do _not_ parse every magic Doxygen tag, and we don't parse them in `@param`
 | |
| format. The goal here was to mostly coexist with people that might want
 | |
| to run Doxygen on the SDL headers, not to build Doxygen from scratch. That
 | |
| being said, compatibility with Doxygen is not a hard requirement here.
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders uses these specific tags to turn this comment into a (hopefully)
 | |
| well-formatted wiki page, and also can generate manpages and books in LaTeX
 | |
| format from it!
 | |
| 
 | |
| Text markup in the headers is _always_ done in Markdown format! But less is
 | |
| more: try not to markup text more than necessary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Doxygen tags we support:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - `\brief one-line description` (Not required, and wikiheaders will remove tag).
 | |
| - `\param varname description` (One for each function/macro parameter)
 | |
| - `\returns description` (One for each function, don't use on `void` returns).
 | |
| - `\sa` (each of these get tucked into a "See Also" section on the wiki)
 | |
| - `\since This function is available since SDL 3.0.0.` (one per Doxygen comment)
 | |
| - `\threadsafety description` (one per function/macro).
 | |
| - `\deprecated description` (one per symbol, if symbol is deprecated!)
 | |
| 
 | |
| Other Doxygen things might exist in the headers, but they aren't understood
 | |
| by wikiheaders.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Use Markdown.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The wiki also supports MediaWiki format, but we are transitioning away from it.
 | |
| The headers always use Markdown. If you're editing the wiki from a git clone,
 | |
| just make .md files and the wiki will know what to do with them.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Most things in the headers can be documented.
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders understands functions, typedefs, structs/unions/enums, `#defines`
 | |
| ... basically most of what makes up a C header. Just slap a Doxygen-style
 | |
| comment in front of most things and it'll work.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Defines right below typedefs and functions bind.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Any `#define` directly below a function or non-struct/union/enum typedef is
 | |
| considered part of that declaration. This happens to work well with how our
 | |
| headers work, as these defines tend to be bitflags and such that are related
 | |
| to that symbol.
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders will include those defines in the syntax section of the wiki
 | |
| page, and generate stub pages for each define that simply says "please refer
 | |
| to (The Actual Symbol You Care About)" with a link. It will also pull in
 | |
| any blank lines and most preprocessor directives for the syntax text, too.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Sometimes an unrelated define, by itself, just happens to be right below one
 | |
| of these symbols in the header. The easiest way to deal with this is either
 | |
| to document that define with a Doxygen-style comment, if it makes sense to do
 | |
| so, or just add a normal C comment right above it if not, so wikiheaders
 | |
| doesn't bind it to the previous symbol.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Don't document the `SDL_test*.h` headers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| These are in the public headers but they aren't really considered public APIs.
 | |
| They live in a separate library that doesn't, or at least probably shouldn't,
 | |
| ship to end users. As such, we don't want it documented on the wiki.
 | |
| 
 | |
| For now, we do this by not having any Doxygen-style comments in these files.
 | |
| Please keep it that way! If you want to document these headers, just don't
 | |
| use the magic two-`*` comment.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## The first line is the summary.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The first line of a piece of documentation is meant to be a succinct
 | |
| description. This is what Doxygen would call the `\brief` tag. wikiheaders
 | |
| will split this text out until the first period (end of sentence!), and when
 | |
| word wrapping, shuffle the overflow into a new paragraph below it.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Split paragraphs with a blank line.
 | |
| 
 | |
| And don't indent them at all (indenting in Markdown is treated as preformatted
 | |
| text).
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders will wordwrap header comments so they fit in 80 columns, so if you
 | |
| don't leave a blank line between paragraphs, they will smush into a single
 | |
| block of text when wordwrapping.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Don't worry about word wrapping.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you don't word-wrap your header edits perfectly (and you won't, I promise),
 | |
| wikiheaders will send your change to the wiki, and then to make things match,
 | |
| send it right back to the headers with correct word wrapping. Since this
 | |
| happens right after you push your changes, you might as well just write
 | |
| however you like and assume the system will clean it up for you.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Things that start with `SDL_` will automatically become wiki links.
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders knows to turn these into links to other pages, so if you reference
 | |
| an SDL symbol in the header documentation, you don't need to link to it.
 | |
| You can optionally wrap the symbol in backticks, and wikiheaders will know to
 | |
| link the backticked thing. It will not generate links in three-backtick
 | |
| code/preformatted blocks.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## URLs will automatically become links.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use Markdown's `[link markup format](https://example.com/)`, but
 | |
| sometimes it's clearer to list bare URLs; the URL will be visible on the
 | |
| wiki page, but also clickable to follow the link. This is up to your judgment
 | |
| on a case-by-case basis.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Hide stuff from wikiheaders.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If all else fails, you can block off pieces of the header with this
 | |
| magic line (whitespace is ignored):
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```c
 | |
| #ifndef SDL_WIKI_DOCUMENTATION_SECTION
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Everything between this line and the next `#endif` will just be skipped by
 | |
| wikiheaders. Note that wikiheaders is not a C preprocessor! Don't try to
 | |
| nest conditionals or use `!defined`.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Just block off sections if you need to. And: you almost never need to.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Hide stuff from the compiler.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If you need to put something that's only of interest to wikiheaders, the
 | |
| convention is to put it in a block like this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```c
 | |
| #ifdef SDL_WIKI_DOCUMENTATION_SECTION
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| Generally this is used when there's a collection of preprocessor conditionals
 | |
| to define the same symbol differently in different circumstances. You put
 | |
| that symbol in this block with some reasonable generic version _and the
 | |
| Doxygen-style comment_. Because wikiheaders doesn't care about this
 | |
| preprocessor magic, and the C compiler can be as fancy as it wants, this is
 | |
| strictly a useful convention.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Struct/union/enum typedefs must have the name on the first line.
 | |
| 
 | |
| This is because wikiheaders is not a full C parser. Don't write this:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```c
 | |
| typedef struct
 | |
| {
 | |
|     int a;
 | |
|     int b;
 | |
| } SDL_MyStruct;
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| ...make sure the name is at the start, too:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```c
 | |
| typedef struct SDL_MyStruct
 | |
| {
 | |
|     int a;
 | |
|     int b;
 | |
| } SDL_MyStruct;
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| wikiheaders will complain loudly if you don't do this, and exit with an
 | |
| error message.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Don't repeat type names in `\param` and `\returns` sections.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Wikiheaders will explicitly mention the datatype for each parameter and the
 | |
| return value, linking to the datatype's wikipage. Users reading the headers
 | |
| can see the types in the function signature right below the documentation
 | |
| comment. So don't mention the type a second time in the documentation if
 | |
| possible. It looks cluttered and repetitive to do so.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Code examples go in the wiki.
 | |
| 
 | |
| We don't want the headers cluttered up with code examples. These live on the
 | |
| wiki pages, and wikiheaders knows to not bridge them back to the headers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Put them in a `## Code Examples` section, and make sure to wrap them in a
 | |
| three-backtick-c section for formatting purposes. Only write code in C,
 | |
| please.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Do you _need_ a code example?
 | |
| 
 | |
| Most code examples aren't actually useful. If your code example is just
 | |
| `SDL_CreateWindow("Hello SDL", 640, 480, 0);` then just delete it; if all
 | |
| you're showing is how to call a function in C, it's not a useful code example.
 | |
| Not all functions need an example. One with complex setup or usage details
 | |
| might, though!
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Code examples are compiled by GitHub Actions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| On each change to the wiki, there is a script that pulls out all the code
 | |
| examples into discrete C files and attempts to compile them, and complains
 | |
| if they don't work.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Unrecognized sections are left alone in the wiki.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A wiki section that starts with `## Section Name` (or `== Section Name ==` in
 | |
| MediaWiki format) that isn't one of the recognized names will be left alone
 | |
| by wikiheaders. Recognized sections might get overwritten with new content
 | |
| from the headers, but the wiki file will not have other sections cleaned out
 | |
| (this is how Code Examples remain wiki only, for example). You can use this
 | |
| to add Wiki-specific text, or stuff that doesn't make sense in a header, or
 | |
| would merely clutter it up.
 | |
| 
 | |
| A possibly-incomplete list of sections that will be overwritten by changes
 | |
| to the headers:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - The page title line, and the "brief" one-sentence description section.
 | |
| - "Deprecated"
 | |
| - "Header File"
 | |
| - "Syntax"
 | |
| - "Function Parameters"
 | |
| - "Macro Parameters"
 | |
| - "Fields"
 | |
| - "Values"
 | |
| - "Return Value"
 | |
| - "Remarks"
 | |
| - "Thread Safety"
 | |
| - "Version"
 | |
| - "See Also"
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## It's okay to repeat yourself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Each individual piece of documentation becomes a separate page on the wiki, so
 | |
| small repeated details can just exist in different pieces of documentation. If
 | |
| it's complicated, it's not unreasonable to say "Please refer to
 | |
| SDL_SomeOtherFunction for more details" ... wiki users can click right
 | |
| through, header users can search for the function name.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## The docs directory is bridged to the wiki, too.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You might be reading this document on the wiki! Any `README-*.md` files in
 | |
| the docs directory are bridged to the wiki, so `docs/README-linux.md` lands
 | |
| at https://wiki.libsdl.org/SDL3/README/linux ...these are just copied directly
 | |
| without any further processing by wikiheaders, and changes go in both
 | |
| directions.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## The wiki can have its own pages, too.
 | |
| 
 | |
| If a page name isn't a symbol that wikiheaders sees in the headers, or a
 | |
| README in the source's `docs` directory, or a few other exceptions, it'll
 | |
| assume it's an unrelated wiki page and leave it alone. So feel free to
 | |
| write any wiki-only pages that make sense and not worry about it junking
 | |
| up the headers!
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Wiki categories are (mostly) managed automatically.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The wiki will see this pattern as the last thing on a page and treat it as a
 | |
| list of categories that page belongs to:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```
 | |
| ----
 | |
| [CategoryStuff](CategoryStuff), [CategoryWhatever](CategoryWhatever)
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| You can use this to simply tag a page as part of a category, and the user can
 | |
| click directly to see other pages in that category. The wiki will
 | |
| automatically manage a `Category*` pages that list any tagged pages.
 | |
| 
 | |
| You _should not_ add tags to the public headers. They don't mean anything
 | |
| there. wikiheaders will add a few tags that make sense when generating wiki
 | |
| content from the header files, and it will preserve other tags already present
 | |
| on the page, so if you want to add extra categories to something, tag it on
 | |
| the wiki itself.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The wiki uses some magic HTML comment tags to decide how to list items on
 | |
| Category pages and let other content live on the page as well. You can
 | |
| see an example of this in action at:
 | |
| 
 | |
| https://raw.githubusercontent.com/libsdl-org/sdlwiki/main/SDL3/CategoryEvents.md
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Categorizing the headers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To put a symbol in a specific category, we use three approaches in SDL:
 | |
| 
 | |
| - Things in the `SDL_test*.h` headers aren't categorized at all (and you
 | |
|   shouldn't document them!)
 | |
| - Most files are categorized by header name: we strip off the leading `SDL_`
 | |
|   and capitalize the first letter of what's left. So everything in SDL_audio.h
 | |
|   is in the "Audio" category, everything in SDL_video.h is in the "Video"
 | |
|   category, etc.
 | |
| - If wikiheaders sees a comment like this on a line by itself...
 | |
|   ```c
 | |
|   /* WIKI CATEGORY: Blah */
 | |
|   ```
 | |
|   ...then all symbols below that will land in the "Blah" category. We use this
 | |
|   at the top of a few headers where the simple
 | |
|   chop-off-SDL_-and-captialize-the-first-letter trick doesn't work well, but
 | |
|   one could theoretically use this for headers that have some overlap in
 | |
|   category.
 | |
| 
 | |
| 
 | |
| ## Category documentation lives in headers.
 | |
| 
 | |
| To document a category (text that lives before the item lists on a wiki
 | |
| category page), you have to follow a simple rule:
 | |
| 
 | |
| The _first_ Doxygen-style comment in a header must start with:
 | |
| 
 | |
| ```
 | |
| /**
 | |
|  * # CategoryABC
 | |
| ```
 | |
| 
 | |
| If these conditions aren't met, wikiheaders will assume that documentation
 | |
| belongs to whatever is below it instead of the Category.
 | |
| 
 | |
| The text of this comment will be added to the appropriate wiki Category page,
 | |
| at the top, replacing everything in the file until it sees a line that starts
 | |
| with an HTML comment (`<!--`), or a line that starts with `----`. Everything
 | |
| after that in the wiki file will be preserved.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Likewise, when bridging _back_ to the headers, if wikiheaders sees one of
 | |
| these comments, it'll copy the top section of the Category page back into the
 | |
| comment.
 | |
| 
 | |
| Beyond stripping the initial ` * ` portion off each line, these comments are
 | |
| treated as pure Markdown. They don't support any Doxygen tags like `\sa` or
 | |
| `\since`.
 | |
| 
 | 
